June 28, 2023

Revisiting Interstellar As Oppenheimer Approaches (Amazon Prime)

Revisiting Interstellar As Oppenheimer Approaches (Amazon Prime)

For years, I was adamant I did not like Interstellar and that it was Christopher Nolan's most flawed film. I revisited it as I'm very excited for Oppenheimer and wanted to give it another chance - maybe I was the problem. And my experience revisiting...

Apple Podcasts podcast player badge
Spotify podcast player badge
Castro podcast player badge
RSS Feed podcast player badge
iHeartRadio podcast player badge
Apple Podcasts podcast player iconSpotify podcast player iconCastro podcast player iconRSS Feed podcast player iconiHeartRadio podcast player icon
For years, I was adamant I did not like Interstellar and that it was Christopher Nolan's most flawed film. I revisited it as I'm very excited for Oppenheimer and wanted to give it another chance - maybe I was the problem. And my experience revisiting it a decade plus later was drastically different than my first viewing in theaters. Did you love Interstellar on a first watch or did it need time to grow on you? I'd love to know what you think.

Trying to figure out, "What should I stream tonight?" Come back to Watch This Tonight as your podcast for the best Film and TV recommendations for what to watch on streaming platforms. Please leave us a five-star review on Apple Podcasts if you're enjoying the show, and mention a movie or TV show you want me to cover (and I will). Subscribe for future episodes.

Reach out to us @BenamorDan (Twitter), watch_this_tonight (Instagram) or @watchthistonightpodcast (TikTok).

Watch This Tonight is a movie recommendation podcast and TV recommendation podcast, produced by Voyage Media. You can find other Voyage Media podcasts at voyagemedia.fm

Thanks for listening.

This show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5626962/advertisement
WEBVTT

1
00:00:01.320 --> 00:00:22.160
Voyage. Welcome to watch this tonight. I'm your host, Dan Bettimore.

2
00:00:22.320 --> 00:00:25.719
I'm a producer, writer of film
and television and now a podcast producer.

3
00:00:26.000 --> 00:00:29.519
And despite having every streaming service,
I never know what to watch. So

4
00:00:29.519 --> 00:00:33.039
anytime I watch something good, I
talk about it on the show. This

5
00:00:33.079 --> 00:00:36.200
way, you'll never have the same
problem I do. I watch this tonight,

6
00:00:36.399 --> 00:00:39.880
there's always something good to watch.
Let's get started today. On the

7
00:00:39.920 --> 00:00:45.520
show, I am revisiting Interstellar.
As Oppenheimer approaches. There's a moment early

8
00:00:45.560 --> 00:00:50.920
an Interstellar where Matthew McConaughey sees an
Indian drone in the sky and he's excited

9
00:00:50.920 --> 00:00:53.920
about it and he wants to pursue
it, but his truck has a flat

10
00:00:53.960 --> 00:00:57.920
tire, and Timothy Shalom plays his
son, tells him, hey man,

11
00:00:58.039 --> 00:01:00.479
there's a flat tire. You can't
and they but he doesn't care. He

12
00:01:00.560 --> 00:01:04.159
drives the truck anyway after it and
they almost drive off a cliff. And

13
00:01:04.200 --> 00:01:07.599
I was thinking about that, and
I thought, this moment, this sequence

14
00:01:08.280 --> 00:01:12.719
is like a microcosm of the incredible
strength of Christopher Nolan's a filmmaker and the

15
00:01:12.840 --> 00:01:18.760
arguable weaknesses. And I always felt
like this was his most flawed film.

16
00:01:19.120 --> 00:01:22.000
I always felt like his ambition is
so great, and I love his ambition,

17
00:01:22.079 --> 00:01:25.400
and the movie is beautifully made,
it constructed, and then you watch

18
00:01:25.400 --> 00:01:26.719
it and you kind of second guess
yourself and you're like, wait a second,

19
00:01:27.239 --> 00:01:30.319
like you think that I have I
is this a plot hole? And

20
00:01:30.359 --> 00:01:34.439
then you're like, well, it's
it's so smartly put together. Maybe there's

21
00:01:34.439 --> 00:01:37.280
just something I'm not understanding. And
in a lot of his movies, I

22
00:01:37.400 --> 00:01:40.079
felt that way, where I'm like, this kind of seems like a plot

23
00:01:40.079 --> 00:01:42.680
hole, and then I think,
no, there must just be something I'm

24
00:01:42.719 --> 00:01:45.799
not understanding. And my memory of
Interstellar is that I saw it in the

25
00:01:45.799 --> 00:01:49.319
theater and I felt that really strongly. At the time, I had been

26
00:01:49.319 --> 00:01:52.239
studying stuff about black holes. I
was writing something about black holes, so

27
00:01:52.280 --> 00:01:55.159
I knew, you know, a
decent amount of stuff about it, and

28
00:01:55.200 --> 00:01:59.200
I felt like this movie just ignored
just the basic idea of how those things

29
00:01:59.239 --> 00:02:02.480
work. And I really had a
very honestly, like a pretty negative reaction

30
00:02:02.519 --> 00:02:06.000
to it, and I kind of
you walked out of the theater. I

31
00:02:06.079 --> 00:02:09.479
never watched again. Obviously, I
am in the minority. The movie made

32
00:02:09.560 --> 00:02:14.360
three quarters of a billion dollars was
critically well received, although if you go

33
00:02:14.439 --> 00:02:16.800
to Rod Tomatoes and then you just
go to just the top critics, it's

34
00:02:16.840 --> 00:02:21.080
a bit more mixed. Most of
the criticism is about the last act.

35
00:02:21.520 --> 00:02:23.800
But I'm very excited for Oppenheimer.
I'm reading a book about three guys that

36
00:02:23.800 --> 00:02:29.520
are involved in making a decision to
use the atomic bomb, and so I

37
00:02:29.639 --> 00:02:31.159
was like, you know, I
feel like I should go back and give

38
00:02:31.199 --> 00:02:36.080
Interstellar another look. Maybe the passage
of time. You know, we do

39
00:02:36.159 --> 00:02:38.240
the all star episodes on the show. Maybe I just kind of judged it

40
00:02:38.319 --> 00:02:43.120
unfairly, and so I did,
and it was interesting. There were some

41
00:02:43.199 --> 00:02:46.840
things that I actually did not understand, but there were also some things that

42
00:02:46.879 --> 00:02:49.879
I think are still kind of plot
holes. So let's get into it.

43
00:02:50.039 --> 00:02:55.840
This is revisiting Interstellar. So this
movie has a single sequence that I think

44
00:02:55.919 --> 00:03:00.800
is better than many entire films,
which is the sequence on the planet.

45
00:03:00.199 --> 00:03:02.879
And obviously we're going to be in
spoilers here. I'm assuming if you're listening,

46
00:03:02.960 --> 00:03:06.599
if you're listening to this, you've
seen an Interstellar. The sequence on

47
00:03:06.639 --> 00:03:10.319
the planet with the mountain sized wave
and the robot turns into like an asterisk

48
00:03:10.400 --> 00:03:14.680
and rolls to get in Hathaway and
they get up in the wave and then

49
00:03:14.680 --> 00:03:17.520
they got to escape. And it's
just a great idea. If you're looking

50
00:03:17.520 --> 00:03:20.919
for a home planet, you're going
to be looking for a planet that has

51
00:03:20.919 --> 00:03:23.800
water. Great, we found a
planet with water, except the whole planet

52
00:03:23.960 --> 00:03:28.759
is these giant killer waves. That's
a great idea of you know, it's

53
00:03:28.759 --> 00:03:31.039
a great example of taking your characters
out of the frying pan and their friar.

54
00:03:31.520 --> 00:03:35.560
I think it is up there with
any sequence, any single sequence in

55
00:03:35.560 --> 00:03:38.800
any Nolan movie. That's great.
And then the planet that Matt Damon is

56
00:03:38.840 --> 00:03:43.719
on is also incredible. There's a
moment when they're flying and they hit a

57
00:03:43.759 --> 00:03:47.000
frozen clouds, so cleverly done,
because it looks like they're just flying they're

58
00:03:47.000 --> 00:03:51.879
seen a cloud and then they hit
it and it's solid and it breaks your

59
00:03:51.919 --> 00:03:54.520
brain for a second. It is
a great idea, and the Damon twist

60
00:03:54.719 --> 00:03:59.759
is incredible, So so much good
stuff, right, But then I think

61
00:03:59.759 --> 00:04:04.080
one reasons that I had issues with
it is that it's so deadly serious at

62
00:04:04.120 --> 00:04:10.039
times in ways that also kind of
feel silly. But it's hard to even

63
00:04:10.800 --> 00:04:13.960
it's sort of intangible, right,
So, for example, At one point,

64
00:04:13.960 --> 00:04:15.480
we're in the future. You know, obviously the story takes place in

65
00:04:15.519 --> 00:04:19.160
the future. The only sustainable crop
is corn. And there's a dinner scene

66
00:04:19.439 --> 00:04:29.959
that is extremely serious and the wife
of Casey Affleck she tells their kid,

67
00:04:30.879 --> 00:04:34.199
finish your fritter. But she says
it like a deadly serious, like heavy

68
00:04:34.279 --> 00:04:38.680
drama away, like finish it fritter. And it's one of those intangibles that

69
00:04:39.199 --> 00:04:43.279
intellectually it makes sense, It logically
makes sense, but it just feels silly

70
00:04:43.879 --> 00:04:48.000
else to explain it. Sort of
the same thing. Jessica Chastain asks Michael

71
00:04:48.079 --> 00:04:53.839
Caine an extremely important question. He's
just admitted that he lied to her and

72
00:04:53.920 --> 00:04:59.079
betrayed her in this horrible way,
and she's she asks him this very important

73
00:04:59.160 --> 00:05:01.680
question that's like found to who she
is as a person, and he just

74
00:05:01.759 --> 00:05:05.600
quotes a poem and dies. Now, to be fair to the film,

75
00:05:06.040 --> 00:05:10.759
probably might the scene that bothered me
the most of the whole movie is when

76
00:05:10.759 --> 00:05:15.439
Anne Hathaway has the thing where she
basically talks about and I had remembered it

77
00:05:15.519 --> 00:05:19.759
as like love is the only dimension
that transcends whatever, and I remember seeing

78
00:05:19.800 --> 00:05:23.560
the theater, like, what are
you talking about now? I when on

79
00:05:23.600 --> 00:05:27.800
the rewatch I was able to listen
more carefully. What she actually says is

80
00:05:28.560 --> 00:05:34.120
love is the only thing we're capable
of perceiving that transcends dimensions of time and

81
00:05:34.160 --> 00:05:39.480
space. So what threw me off
there was the word dimension. In the

82
00:05:39.480 --> 00:05:44.279
theater. It's a two hour and
forty nine minute movie. It's so easy

83
00:05:44.319 --> 00:05:46.759
to miss, like exactly what she's
saying. I took it as she's saying

84
00:05:46.800 --> 00:05:49.319
that, like, love is a
dimension, which I'm like, love is

85
00:05:49.319 --> 00:05:53.240
an abstract idea, what are you
talking about? But she's saying that love

86
00:05:53.319 --> 00:05:57.680
is something that still applies across physical
space in the passage of time, which

87
00:05:57.720 --> 00:06:00.079
is of course true. If she
literally just took the word dimension, that

88
00:06:00.160 --> 00:06:04.040
totally would have worked for me.
But I misunderstood on the first watch because

89
00:06:04.120 --> 00:06:10.480
just trying to catch it and now
scrutinizing it more carefully, obviously it makes

90
00:06:10.519 --> 00:06:14.519
sense. It's clearly illustrated in the
relationship with Chastain and McConaughey, which does

91
00:06:14.560 --> 00:06:16.759
transcend space and time, even before
they get into this stuff in the third

92
00:06:16.800 --> 00:06:20.319
act. And I relate obviously much
more into the central relationship now that I

93
00:06:20.399 --> 00:06:25.439
have a daughter and you know,
there's a moment where I think it's the

94
00:06:25.519 --> 00:06:28.399
first planet they go to, and
then they go back up and like twenty

95
00:06:28.480 --> 00:06:33.120
years have passed and they have twenty
years of video messages and McConaughey is watching

96
00:06:33.160 --> 00:06:38.199
those twenty years of video messages,
and that all hit me much harder now,

97
00:06:38.319 --> 00:06:42.279
right, You're much more aware of
time is so much more precious in

98
00:06:42.279 --> 00:06:45.399
your mind when you have children and
you see them growing and you know to

99
00:06:45.519 --> 00:06:48.720
miss that time. I actually understand
what that means now. So I would

100
00:06:48.720 --> 00:06:54.439
say my biggest criticism of the film
now is like null and void, I

101
00:06:54.800 --> 00:07:00.480
was wrong. My second biggest criticism
of the film is that they just casually

102
00:07:00.600 --> 00:07:05.800
invent this concept of a gentle singularity. So this is something that I again,

103
00:07:05.800 --> 00:07:08.800
when I saw the movie, I
was like, this seems made up,

104
00:07:09.079 --> 00:07:12.560
and then I googled it when I
watched this yesterday, and it is

105
00:07:12.560 --> 00:07:14.279
made up. It's not a real
thing. They just made it up.

106
00:07:15.680 --> 00:07:18.120
So if you research black holes,
the idea of the black hole is that

107
00:07:18.600 --> 00:07:24.879
the nature of it if you if
you as in a spaceship or in this

108
00:07:24.879 --> 00:07:29.480
movie, Matthew McConaughey ejects into space, or to even get close to a

109
00:07:29.519 --> 00:07:31.800
black hole. You would for sure
die, no matter what, you would

110
00:07:31.839 --> 00:07:35.879
die. It's that's it. It's
not more complicated than that. And you

111
00:07:35.920 --> 00:07:41.839
know, they it's a problem because
as storytellers, it's so tantalizing, like,

112
00:07:41.879 --> 00:07:43.839
oh man, what happens when you
go in a black hole? The

113
00:07:43.879 --> 00:07:47.279
answer is you die, that's the
answer. And so they just made this

114
00:07:47.360 --> 00:07:53.360
thing up to deal with that problem, the idea of the gentle singularity.

115
00:07:53.879 --> 00:07:57.439
And I think the reason bothered me
so much, and this is this is

116
00:07:57.439 --> 00:08:01.720
how marketing affects your perception movie.
They had made such a big deal about,

117
00:08:01.879 --> 00:08:05.600
oh my god, it is so
scientifically accurate in the marketing leading up

118
00:08:05.639 --> 00:08:07.639
to the release of the film.
So I think that's why maybe it rubbed

119
00:08:07.639 --> 00:08:11.160
me the wrong way. It's a
perfectly reasonable like you have to make some

120
00:08:11.160 --> 00:08:15.120
stuff up in service of the story. And it's also you know, you

121
00:08:15.120 --> 00:08:16.560
can make the argument of like,
hey, who really knows none of us

122
00:08:16.560 --> 00:08:20.079
have been in a black hole,
so you know, I was much more

123
00:08:20.199 --> 00:08:24.399
lenient on it this watch. The
other thing is that the movie is pretty

124
00:08:24.439 --> 00:08:26.600
long, so I feel like in
the theater, if a couple things rub

125
00:08:26.600 --> 00:08:30.279
you the wrong way, you can
kind of check out on it at home.

126
00:08:30.560 --> 00:08:33.759
I was able to take a break, go in for the last forty

127
00:08:33.799 --> 00:08:37.200
five minutes with a clear head,
and I really did enjoy it much more

128
00:08:37.320 --> 00:08:41.039
on this viewing. That being said, the part that I have a tough

129
00:08:41.080 --> 00:08:45.120
time with at the end, at
the very very end. So Matthew McConaughey,

130
00:08:45.200 --> 00:08:50.120
the whole movie is about him and
his daughter being separated and then making

131
00:08:50.120 --> 00:08:52.279
their way back to each other.
And she's on her deathbed and it's like,

132
00:08:52.360 --> 00:08:56.279
hey, I haven't seen you my
entire life, and she's like,

133
00:08:56.320 --> 00:08:58.679
you know, you shouldn't watch your
child die. Like, I'm good,

134
00:09:00.080 --> 00:09:03.519
you can piece out go find Anne
halfaway and he's like, all right,

135
00:09:03.519 --> 00:09:05.600
sweet, let me go find it
and halfway and it felt a little bit

136
00:09:05.600 --> 00:09:09.679
like kind of a betrayal of the
themes of the entire movie. So again

137
00:09:09.720 --> 00:09:13.759
I just kind of rubbed me and
bit the wrong way. But overall,

138
00:09:13.799 --> 00:09:16.879
I would say my initial reaction on
this very much was like the arrogance of

139
00:09:16.919 --> 00:09:20.799
youth, right Like, sitting there
thinking like as a twenty six year old

140
00:09:20.840 --> 00:09:26.080
or whatever, I was being like, oh, yeah, this movie sucks.

141
00:09:26.080 --> 00:09:28.639
The movie rocks. It's a really
good movie. You know. My

142
00:09:28.759 --> 00:09:33.519
issues with it. Notwithstanding, I
think my issues with it in the grand

143
00:09:33.519 --> 00:09:37.799
picture of what the movie accomplishes are
relatively minor. And this movie is really

144
00:09:37.799 --> 00:09:43.440
good, breaking news. Interstellar is
good. Oh it really, it really

145
00:09:43.519 --> 00:09:46.000
is. I was I was way
too hard on it. But in the

146
00:09:46.039 --> 00:09:50.480
tradition of these all star episodes on
the show, definitely the passage of time

147
00:09:50.519 --> 00:09:54.480
affects your viewing. I am so
curious to know if there's any of you

148
00:09:54.480 --> 00:09:58.279
out there listening to this who had
an equally mixed reaction Interstellar, either when

149
00:09:58.279 --> 00:10:03.360
you first saw it maybe you still
do or is it just gangbusters for you

150
00:10:03.399 --> 00:10:07.200
all the way through and you just
absolutely loved it the first time, still

151
00:10:07.200 --> 00:10:09.840
love it? Has it played different
for you as the years have passed.

152
00:10:11.279 --> 00:10:13.360
Yeah, I just would love to
know your thoughts on Interstellar. You can

153
00:10:13.399 --> 00:10:18.200
always reach me at Benamore Dan on
Twitter, watch This Tonight on Instagram,

154
00:10:18.279 --> 00:10:22.039
watch This Night podcast on TikTok,
or you can join our Facebook group.

155
00:10:22.399 --> 00:10:24.480
That is the show for today Until
next time. Bye,