May 22, 2023
Shawshank Redemption Deep-Dive: “No One’s At The Theatre” And The LA Times Hates It

Sometimes, you just get something wrong. In doing this deep dive, I turned up Kenneth Turan's Los Angeles Times 1994 review of The Shawshank Redemption, an incredible bashing of the film that is now indisputably one of the most revered films in human...
Sometimes, you just get something wrong. In doing this deep dive, I turned up Kenneth Turan's Los Angeles Times 1994 review of The Shawshank Redemption, an incredible bashing of the film that is now indisputably one of the most revered films in human history, beloved around the world, and still #1 on the IMDB top movies list. I also discovered that this male-centric film likely would not have existed, not cast Morgan Freeman, and not had its iconic ending if it were not for female producer Liz Glotzer vital contributions. This is my deep dive into the making of The Shawshank Redemption.
Trying to figure out, "What should I stream tonight?" Come back to Watch This Tonight as your podcast for the best movie recommendations for what to watch on streaming platforms. Please leave us a five-star review on Apple Podcasts if you're enjoying the show, and mention a movie or TV show you want me to cover (and I will). Subscribe for future episodes.
Reach out to us @BenamorDan (Twitter), watch_this_tonight (Instagram) or @watchthistonightpodcast (TikTok).
Watch This Tonight is a movie recommendation podcast and TV recommendation podcast, produced by Voyage Media. You can find other Voyage Media podcasts at voyagemedia.fm
Thanks for listening.
Trying to figure out, "What should I stream tonight?" Come back to Watch This Tonight as your podcast for the best movie recommendations for what to watch on streaming platforms. Please leave us a five-star review on Apple Podcasts if you're enjoying the show, and mention a movie or TV show you want me to cover (and I will). Subscribe for future episodes.
Reach out to us @BenamorDan (Twitter), watch_this_tonight (Instagram) or @watchthistonightpodcast (TikTok).
Watch This Tonight is a movie recommendation podcast and TV recommendation podcast, produced by Voyage Media. You can find other Voyage Media podcasts at voyagemedia.fm
Thanks for listening.
WEBVTT
1
00:00:01.320 --> 00:00:22.160
Voyage. Welcome to watch this tonight. I'm your host, Dan Bettimore.
2
00:00:22.320 --> 00:00:26.120
I'm a produced writer of film and
television and now a podcast producer. And
3
00:00:26.160 --> 00:00:29.879
despite having every streaming service, I
never know what to watch. So anytime
4
00:00:29.920 --> 00:00:33.240
I watch something good, I talk
about it on the show. This way,
5
00:00:33.280 --> 00:00:36.200
you'll never have the same problem I
do. I watch this tonight,
6
00:00:36.399 --> 00:00:40.439
there's always something good to watch.
Let's get started. Today on the show,
7
00:00:40.479 --> 00:00:44.320
I'm doing one of my deep dives
into the making of The Shawshank Redemption.
8
00:00:44.679 --> 00:00:48.719
I found some really cool stuff and
researching this, including a review of
9
00:00:48.719 --> 00:00:54.240
the film by very prominent critic that
is one of the great It's up there
10
00:00:54.240 --> 00:01:00.960
with the Unforgiven Reader's Memo in terms
of just wow that. So I'm really
11
00:01:00.359 --> 00:01:03.799
excited to share that with you.
A lot of also interesting stuff about some
12
00:01:03.879 --> 00:01:07.719
tension in the making of the film
in different ways it could have been made,
13
00:01:07.799 --> 00:01:11.640
and the initial sort of belly flop
when it was first released, and
14
00:01:12.000 --> 00:01:15.480
all that kind of stuff. So
there's a lot of cool stuff here.
15
00:01:15.519 --> 00:01:19.959
There's been a good amount of reporting. I used the sources for this,
16
00:01:19.519 --> 00:01:25.359
Wikipedia, Vanity Fair, Business Insider, and the Los Angeles Times. So
17
00:01:25.480 --> 00:01:30.120
Shawshank Redemption obviously one of the greatest
movies ever made. I think it's still
18
00:01:30.159 --> 00:01:34.599
today the number one movie by user
rating on IMDb, which is an amazing
19
00:01:34.599 --> 00:01:41.519
accomplishment. Seven Oscar nominations. Library
of Congress initially only made sixteen million dollars
20
00:01:41.519 --> 00:01:45.599
at the box office, was considered
a flop, ended up doing three hundred
21
00:01:45.640 --> 00:01:49.159
and twenty thousand VHS rentals, where
it made an insane amount of money,
22
00:01:49.159 --> 00:01:53.799
and then even more in ancillary and
television and stuff like that. But it
23
00:01:53.840 --> 00:01:59.239
all started with Frank Darbat buying the
right to the short story in nineteen eighty
24
00:01:59.239 --> 00:02:01.680
seven. Five years later, writes
the script and it's to cass Rock gets
25
00:02:01.760 --> 00:02:05.560
twenty five million on our budget,
makes the movie. What I didn't know
26
00:02:05.719 --> 00:02:09.039
was that behind the scenes, even
though there's a movie with no women in
27
00:02:09.039 --> 00:02:15.960
it, there was a female producer
named Liz Glotzer who was essential to the
28
00:02:15.000 --> 00:02:20.039
success of this movie and had like
critical roles in it getting made and the
29
00:02:20.120 --> 00:02:23.080
quality of it pretty much all the
way through. So we're going to get
30
00:02:23.159 --> 00:02:27.120
to her and her involvement. Daribond
first connected with Stephen King by doing his
31
00:02:27.199 --> 00:02:30.120
Dollar Babies thing. So Stephen King
has this thing where if you want to
32
00:02:30.159 --> 00:02:32.919
get the right to one of his
short stories. He will essentially allow you
33
00:02:34.000 --> 00:02:37.719
to make a movie out of it
for a dollar, and you can make
34
00:02:37.759 --> 00:02:42.039
it as a short film. So
it's like a way to showcase yourself if
35
00:02:42.039 --> 00:02:45.759
you're an inspiring filmmaker. My cousin
actually did this. There's somewhere out there
36
00:02:46.319 --> 00:02:51.240
where we made a film based on
one of Stephen King's short stories, and
37
00:02:51.680 --> 00:02:53.280
that exists, so we know,
I know for sure it's real thing because
38
00:02:53.319 --> 00:02:57.800
we actually did it. So first
Deibond does that, and then four years
39
00:02:57.840 --> 00:03:02.080
later he buys the rights to Ria
Hayworth and the Shaw Shank Redemption. There
40
00:03:02.080 --> 00:03:06.800
are differing sources on how much he
paid. Wikipedia says five grand, screen
41
00:03:06.879 --> 00:03:12.000
Rand says one thousand. Either way, King never used the money, He
42
00:03:12.000 --> 00:03:15.199
didn't cash it. He just kept
it, and then later he framed it
43
00:03:15.400 --> 00:03:17.840
and returned it to Frank Darabot with
a note that said, in case you
44
00:03:17.919 --> 00:03:23.560
ever need bail money, love Steve
Now. At the time, prison movies
45
00:03:23.560 --> 00:03:29.120
were supposed to be unlikely to be
successful with the box office. Darabont's script
46
00:03:29.159 --> 00:03:32.919
was first read by Castle Rock Entertainment
producer Liz Gotser, who loved prison movies
47
00:03:34.319 --> 00:03:38.479
and she loved his script so much
she threatened to quit Castle Rock if they
48
00:03:38.479 --> 00:03:43.039
did not make the Shaw Shank Redemption. Obviously, Rob Reyner of Castle Rock
49
00:03:43.120 --> 00:03:46.400
had previously adapted King's nineteen eighty two
novella The Body and to Stand By Me.
50
00:03:46.879 --> 00:03:52.080
He wanted to do it with Tom
Cruise as Andy and Harrison Ford as
51
00:03:52.120 --> 00:03:55.599
read. The reason that Morgan Freeman
was cast was because Liz Gotser ignored the
52
00:03:55.639 --> 00:04:00.000
novella's description of a white guy,
a white irishman named Red. And you
53
00:04:00.039 --> 00:04:02.960
know, basically I guess one in
Freeman for it. So again, think
54
00:04:02.960 --> 00:04:08.599
about how critical her involvement that right
away, that's like half of the successive
55
00:04:08.639 --> 00:04:12.360
movie. Basically. Dary Bond initially
looked at some of his favorite actors like
56
00:04:12.599 --> 00:04:15.839
Gene Hackman and Albert Duval for the
role of Andy Dufraine, but they were
57
00:04:15.920 --> 00:04:19.279
unavailable. I would have loved to
see this with Duval, Tom Cruise,
58
00:04:19.319 --> 00:04:24.399
Tom Hanks, and Kevin Costner were
offered and passed on the role. But
59
00:04:24.480 --> 00:04:28.240
in Cruise's case, he attended table
readings in the script and he just didn't
60
00:04:28.240 --> 00:04:30.720
want to work for Darrebon because Darrebont
was not an experienced director. Now,
61
00:04:30.720 --> 00:04:33.879
at one point, and again according
to different sources on the Internet, it's
62
00:04:33.920 --> 00:04:38.360
between two and three million dollars.
Rob Ryner goes to Dary Bond and he
63
00:04:38.399 --> 00:04:42.600
says, if you let me make
the movie with Cruise like I'll direct the
64
00:04:42.639 --> 00:04:46.199
Cruisal starring it, I'll give you
three million bucks. Dere Bond's like,
65
00:04:46.199 --> 00:04:50.600
no, pretty remarkable. Brad Pitt
was initially cast in the role of Tommy,
66
00:04:50.800 --> 00:04:54.839
but he dropped out after his success
in Delma Louise and his was kind
67
00:04:54.879 --> 00:04:58.839
of a rising star and that kind
of thing. James Genelfini passed on portraying
68
00:04:59.399 --> 00:05:03.399
Bogs. In terms of the production, Morgan Freeman was pretty candid about Darbot
69
00:05:03.560 --> 00:05:08.720
being a pain in the ass.
He said, most of the time the
70
00:05:08.800 --> 00:05:12.319
tension was between the cast and director. I remember having a bad moment with
71
00:05:12.360 --> 00:05:14.800
the director, had a few of
those. He went on to say,
72
00:05:15.199 --> 00:05:19.240
the answer was no. In reference
to doing a lot of takes, I
73
00:05:19.319 --> 00:05:24.079
don't want to be chewing the scenery. Acting itself as indifficult, but having
74
00:05:24.120 --> 00:05:28.319
to do something again and again for
no discernible reason tends to be a bit
75
00:05:28.319 --> 00:05:32.120
debilitating to the energy. Interestingly enough, Morgan Freeman obviously was in seven David
76
00:05:32.120 --> 00:05:34.879
Fitcher film, So be interested to
know what do you thinks about David Fincher.
77
00:05:34.920 --> 00:05:41.879
But apparently it took nine hours to
film the part when Andy first approaches
78
00:05:41.920 --> 00:05:46.360
Read to procure a rock hammer.
They did so many takes that Freeman came
79
00:05:46.480 --> 00:05:48.680
to set the next day it was
his arm to sling and refused to do
80
00:05:48.720 --> 00:05:54.000
any indial takes. Darbot looking back, and it kind of has some quotes
81
00:05:54.040 --> 00:05:57.439
to suggest that he learned from it. He said, a director really needs
82
00:05:57.480 --> 00:06:00.879
to have an internal brometer to measure
what any of an actor needs. You
83
00:06:00.920 --> 00:06:04.000
know, as far as I start
what I mean, Darbot is one of
84
00:06:04.000 --> 00:06:10.319
the great writer, director, creative
people in the history of Hollywood. So
85
00:06:10.759 --> 00:06:14.560
it sounds like he learned from it
and probably made him a better director.
86
00:06:14.600 --> 00:06:15.639
But I mean, you know what
he said. I mean, the movie
87
00:06:15.680 --> 00:06:18.439
is amazing. It was it was
worth it. Yeah, I mean,
88
00:06:18.480 --> 00:06:21.240
it doesn't sound like he was abusive
or anything. It sounds like he just
89
00:06:21.279 --> 00:06:26.319
did a lot of takes. During
the iconic scene of Andy escaping your two
90
00:06:26.399 --> 00:06:30.759
freedom through a sewer pipe described as
a river of shit, Robin's crawled through
91
00:06:30.759 --> 00:06:33.720
a mixture of water, chocolate syrup, and sawdust. The stream that he
92
00:06:33.759 --> 00:06:39.839
emerged into was certified toxic by a
chemist and they had to damn the stream
93
00:06:39.959 --> 00:06:45.959
and use chlorination to partially decontaminate it. Robins said, when you're doing a
94
00:06:45.959 --> 00:06:46.680
film, you want to be a
good soldier. You don't want to be
95
00:06:46.759 --> 00:06:48.680
the one who gets in the way, so you will do things as an
96
00:06:48.680 --> 00:06:53.439
actor that are compromising to your physical
health and safety. We've gotten a lot
97
00:06:53.439 --> 00:07:00.920
better about that, said Roger.
Deakins said that the scene is one of
98
00:07:00.920 --> 00:07:03.480
his least favorite. He says he
overlid it. So this is scene when
99
00:07:03.800 --> 00:07:13.439
Robinson gets out of the sewer pipe
and all that. Darabont said that they
100
00:07:13.439 --> 00:07:15.720
had to be precisely what they could
film, so they had a limited filming
101
00:07:15.720 --> 00:07:18.199
schedule. He said he regretted that
he could not film a close up of
102
00:07:18.279 --> 00:07:23.000
Robin's face as he climbed down out
of the hole from his cell. So
103
00:07:23.040 --> 00:07:27.439
again, it just shows you that
no matter what you do, no matter
104
00:07:27.480 --> 00:07:30.720
how great of a thing you're creating
your life, you're always going to be
105
00:07:30.720 --> 00:07:34.079
like, oh man, I could
have been a better if I just did.
106
00:07:34.240 --> 00:07:40.800
It's amazing. That part's great,
Like what this like iconic said about
107
00:07:40.800 --> 00:07:44.560
It's just this is what I love
about doing these. One scripted scene,
108
00:07:44.600 --> 00:07:47.240
which Darabont described as his best work, was left unfilmed because of the shooting
109
00:07:47.240 --> 00:07:51.240
schedule, and the scene a dreaming
Red is sucked into the poster of Rita
110
00:07:51.279 --> 00:07:56.680
Hayworth to find himself alone and insignificant
on the Pacific shore, saying I am
111
00:07:56.800 --> 00:08:00.800
terrified. There's no way home.
Darabont said that you were gretted being unable
112
00:08:00.839 --> 00:08:03.920
to capture the scene that actually would
have been kind of cool, especially considering
113
00:08:03.920 --> 00:08:07.439
the ending. In Darabon's original vision
for the end of the film, Red
114
00:08:07.560 --> 00:08:11.720
is seen riding a bus towards the
Mexican border, leaving his fate ambiguous.
115
00:08:11.160 --> 00:08:16.319
Glotser insisted on including the scene of
Red and Andy reuniting and Zewatanejo, she
116
00:08:16.399 --> 00:08:20.839
said. Dara Bond felt this was
a commercial, sappy ending, but Glotser
117
00:08:20.879 --> 00:08:24.759
one of the audiences season together again. Can you imagine it's the difference if
118
00:08:24.800 --> 00:08:31.120
that was not there. It was
decided to mostly omit Stephen King's name from
119
00:08:31.120 --> 00:08:35.120
the advertising because the studio wanted to
attract a more prestigious audience who might reject
120
00:08:35.159 --> 00:08:39.960
a film from the writer of The
Shining and Kujoe Following a Hollywood tradition of
121
00:08:39.039 --> 00:08:43.080
visiting different theaters and opening night to
see the audience few their film live,
122
00:08:43.519 --> 00:08:46.639
Dara Bonning Lotser went to the Cinerama
Dome, so which is here, actually
123
00:08:46.679 --> 00:08:50.000
was down the street from where used
to live, but they found no one
124
00:08:50.039 --> 00:08:52.639
there. Glotzer claimed that the pair
actually sold two tickets outside the theater,
125
00:08:52.960 --> 00:08:56.279
with the promise that if the buyers
did not like the film, they could
126
00:08:56.279 --> 00:08:58.879
ask Castle Rock for a refund.
Quote. That was our big opening night,
127
00:09:00.200 --> 00:09:03.600
Glasser said dryly. While critics praise
the film, Glotser believed that a
128
00:09:03.679 --> 00:09:07.879
lackluster review from the Los Angeles Times
pushed crowds away. And here is that
129
00:09:07.960 --> 00:09:13.120
review from Kenneth Duran nineteen ninety four. This is what he said. Awash
130
00:09:13.360 --> 00:09:18.159
in a bad news culture where horrors
compete for media attention, America's appetite for
131
00:09:18.240 --> 00:09:22.639
feel good movies is all but insatiable. How else to explain The Shawshank Redemption,
132
00:09:22.840 --> 00:09:26.360
a film that hides a warm and
cuddly fantasy about prison life behind sleek
133
00:09:26.399 --> 00:09:31.240
brutality. So much the better to
convince us that even inside those walls,
134
00:09:31.320 --> 00:09:35.200
life can be grand. Starring Tim
Robbins and Morgan Freeman is two lifers who
135
00:09:35.240 --> 00:09:39.440
demonstrate the great things prison can do
for you. Shawshanks sense mentality is of
136
00:09:39.480 --> 00:09:43.320
a new Hollywood variety. Its message
of hope and friendship comes premixed to the
137
00:09:43.320 --> 00:09:48.559
sizeable ballop of unappetizing violence, intended
to convince audiences that what they're watching is
138
00:09:48.559 --> 00:09:52.720
in a big love of cotton candy
after all. Adapted from a Steve that
139
00:09:52.879 --> 00:09:56.720
just keeps going Like This, adapted
from a Stephen King novella. Shawshank also
140
00:09:56.799 --> 00:10:01.120
labors under its literary origins, with
many of its situations feeling like thin doodles
141
00:10:00.759 --> 00:10:05.279
blown up to big screen size,
and its entire last section has the kind
142
00:10:05.279 --> 00:10:09.440
of serious pausibility problems that are early
apparent when the written word takes physical form.
143
00:10:09.840 --> 00:10:13.639
Paradoxically, it is shaw shanks zealousness
in trying to cast a rosy glow
144
00:10:13.759 --> 00:10:18.879
over the prison experience that makes us
feel we're doing harder time than the folks
145
00:10:18.879 --> 00:10:22.679
inside. So Keath Duran basically thought
this movie sucked. He thought watching this
146
00:10:22.759 --> 00:10:28.360
movie was like being in prison.
He said, in fact, it was
147
00:10:28.440 --> 00:10:31.440
worse to be a prison. We're
doing harder time than the folks inside.
148
00:10:31.279 --> 00:10:35.759
I wonder if when Keneth Turan,
you know, Keneth Duran was obviously a
149
00:10:35.879 --> 00:10:39.759
very well known critic, retired from
Los Angeles Times at seventy three years old
150
00:10:39.759 --> 00:10:41.799
and twenty twenty. Do you think
when Keath Duran like hangs out with the
151
00:10:41.840 --> 00:10:45.840
other film critics, they give him
shit for this because there are I mean,
152
00:10:45.840 --> 00:10:48.279
when you go to press screenings,
it's there, there's all the different
153
00:10:48.279 --> 00:10:52.000
critics are invited and they all go
and you see each other again. You
154
00:10:52.039 --> 00:10:56.639
know, I did this in college, and I have to imagine that at
155
00:10:56.679 --> 00:10:58.639
least once or twice in his life. There must have been another critic was
156
00:10:58.679 --> 00:11:03.120
like, yeah, Shaw, Shank
really sucked huck Ken and really gave him
157
00:11:03.399 --> 00:11:09.240
for it. After bombing initially,
the movie did so well on television that,
158
00:11:09.279 --> 00:11:13.240
according to Business Insider, the actor
who plays the warden he said,
159
00:11:13.679 --> 00:11:18.159
he still gets residual payments, not
huge, but steady close to six figures.
160
00:11:18.679 --> 00:11:22.759
And even you know, this goes
all the way we're talking about like
161
00:11:22.799 --> 00:11:26.759
two thousand and four, like like
well after the movie is released. He
162
00:11:26.799 --> 00:11:31.480
even said, I suspect my daughter
years from now will still be getting checks.
163
00:11:31.919 --> 00:11:35.679
And then lastly, I thought Tim
Robbins kind of said it best the
164
00:11:35.759 --> 00:11:39.159
enduring power of the movie. He
said that I believe part of the reason
165
00:11:39.200 --> 00:11:41.519
the movie is so important to people
is that, in a way it works
166
00:11:41.840 --> 00:11:45.919
as a whole for whatever your life
is. That no matter what your prison
167
00:11:46.039 --> 00:11:48.320
is, whether it's a job you
hate, a bad relationship that you're slogging
168
00:11:48.360 --> 00:11:52.639
through, whether your warden is a
terrible boss or a wife or a husband,
169
00:11:54.279 --> 00:11:58.039
it holds out the possibility that there
is freedom inside you and that at
170
00:11:58.080 --> 00:12:01.399
some point in life there was a
warm spot in the beach and that we
171
00:12:01.440 --> 00:12:05.519
can all get there, but sometimes
it takes a while. How beautifully sad
172
00:12:05.559 --> 00:12:09.759
about Tim Robbins. So that's Shaw
shank Man. It's so great to see
173
00:12:09.759 --> 00:12:11.919
Tim and Silo. I don't know
what the hell they're doing with this character.
174
00:12:13.440 --> 00:12:16.559
I feel like they haven't given him
enough to do. I sincerely hope
175
00:12:16.639 --> 00:12:20.240
he is like way more prominent in
the rest of it. He's so good.
176
00:12:20.759 --> 00:12:22.840
It's like I talked about this when
I do the Silo episode. It
177
00:12:22.960 --> 00:12:26.879
just feels like, for whatever reason, they haven't figured out another role like
178
00:12:26.919 --> 00:12:31.399
that to give him. You know, he's he's so great if you can
179
00:12:31.480 --> 00:12:37.679
find the right thing to plug him
into and he's still relatively young, you
180
00:12:37.720 --> 00:12:39.960
know. I mean, there's still
time for him to have another sort of
181
00:12:39.960 --> 00:12:43.879
career defining role. And when you
think about Shaws Shank, you think about
182
00:12:43.919 --> 00:12:46.679
him and it Man. So that's
the making of the Shaw Shank redemption.
183
00:12:48.639 --> 00:12:54.799
With apologies to Kenneth Duran, that
is the show for today. I should
184
00:12:54.879 --> 00:12:58.799
no knock on wood. That's me
knocking on wood. I should have to
185
00:12:58.159 --> 00:13:03.720
really cools interviews as the next two
episodes. If all goes well, if
186
00:13:03.759 --> 00:13:07.720
something goes catastrophically wrong, you'll probably
just hear a regular episode M. But
187
00:13:07.840 --> 00:13:11.159
that's it for now. Thank you
so much as always for listening. Until
188
00:13:11.240 --> 00:13:20.639
next time, Bye bye, m
M.
1
00:00:01.320 --> 00:00:22.160
Voyage. Welcome to watch this tonight. I'm your host, Dan Bettimore.
2
00:00:22.320 --> 00:00:26.120
I'm a produced writer of film and
television and now a podcast producer. And
3
00:00:26.160 --> 00:00:29.879
despite having every streaming service, I
never know what to watch. So anytime
4
00:00:29.920 --> 00:00:33.240
I watch something good, I talk
about it on the show. This way,
5
00:00:33.280 --> 00:00:36.200
you'll never have the same problem I
do. I watch this tonight,
6
00:00:36.399 --> 00:00:40.439
there's always something good to watch.
Let's get started. Today on the show,
7
00:00:40.479 --> 00:00:44.320
I'm doing one of my deep dives
into the making of The Shawshank Redemption.
8
00:00:44.679 --> 00:00:48.719
I found some really cool stuff and
researching this, including a review of
9
00:00:48.719 --> 00:00:54.240
the film by very prominent critic that
is one of the great It's up there
10
00:00:54.240 --> 00:01:00.960
with the Unforgiven Reader's Memo in terms
of just wow that. So I'm really
11
00:01:00.359 --> 00:01:03.799
excited to share that with you.
A lot of also interesting stuff about some
12
00:01:03.879 --> 00:01:07.719
tension in the making of the film
in different ways it could have been made,
13
00:01:07.799 --> 00:01:11.640
and the initial sort of belly flop
when it was first released, and
14
00:01:12.000 --> 00:01:15.480
all that kind of stuff. So
there's a lot of cool stuff here.
15
00:01:15.519 --> 00:01:19.959
There's been a good amount of reporting. I used the sources for this,
16
00:01:19.519 --> 00:01:25.359
Wikipedia, Vanity Fair, Business Insider, and the Los Angeles Times. So
17
00:01:25.480 --> 00:01:30.120
Shawshank Redemption obviously one of the greatest
movies ever made. I think it's still
18
00:01:30.159 --> 00:01:34.599
today the number one movie by user
rating on IMDb, which is an amazing
19
00:01:34.599 --> 00:01:41.519
accomplishment. Seven Oscar nominations. Library
of Congress initially only made sixteen million dollars
20
00:01:41.519 --> 00:01:45.599
at the box office, was considered
a flop, ended up doing three hundred
21
00:01:45.640 --> 00:01:49.159
and twenty thousand VHS rentals, where
it made an insane amount of money,
22
00:01:49.159 --> 00:01:53.799
and then even more in ancillary and
television and stuff like that. But it
23
00:01:53.840 --> 00:01:59.239
all started with Frank Darbat buying the
right to the short story in nineteen eighty
24
00:01:59.239 --> 00:02:01.680
seven. Five years later, writes
the script and it's to cass Rock gets
25
00:02:01.760 --> 00:02:05.560
twenty five million on our budget,
makes the movie. What I didn't know
26
00:02:05.719 --> 00:02:09.039
was that behind the scenes, even
though there's a movie with no women in
27
00:02:09.039 --> 00:02:15.960
it, there was a female producer
named Liz Glotzer who was essential to the
28
00:02:15.000 --> 00:02:20.039
success of this movie and had like
critical roles in it getting made and the
29
00:02:20.120 --> 00:02:23.080
quality of it pretty much all the
way through. So we're going to get
30
00:02:23.159 --> 00:02:27.120
to her and her involvement. Daribond
first connected with Stephen King by doing his
31
00:02:27.199 --> 00:02:30.120
Dollar Babies thing. So Stephen King
has this thing where if you want to
32
00:02:30.159 --> 00:02:32.919
get the right to one of his
short stories. He will essentially allow you
33
00:02:34.000 --> 00:02:37.719
to make a movie out of it
for a dollar, and you can make
34
00:02:37.759 --> 00:02:42.039
it as a short film. So
it's like a way to showcase yourself if
35
00:02:42.039 --> 00:02:45.759
you're an inspiring filmmaker. My cousin
actually did this. There's somewhere out there
36
00:02:46.319 --> 00:02:51.240
where we made a film based on
one of Stephen King's short stories, and
37
00:02:51.680 --> 00:02:53.280
that exists, so we know,
I know for sure it's real thing because
38
00:02:53.319 --> 00:02:57.800
we actually did it. So first
Deibond does that, and then four years
39
00:02:57.840 --> 00:03:02.080
later he buys the rights to Ria
Hayworth and the Shaw Shank Redemption. There
40
00:03:02.080 --> 00:03:06.800
are differing sources on how much he
paid. Wikipedia says five grand, screen
41
00:03:06.879 --> 00:03:12.000
Rand says one thousand. Either way, King never used the money, He
42
00:03:12.000 --> 00:03:15.199
didn't cash it. He just kept
it, and then later he framed it
43
00:03:15.400 --> 00:03:17.840
and returned it to Frank Darabot with
a note that said, in case you
44
00:03:17.919 --> 00:03:23.560
ever need bail money, love Steve
Now. At the time, prison movies
45
00:03:23.560 --> 00:03:29.120
were supposed to be unlikely to be
successful with the box office. Darabont's script
46
00:03:29.159 --> 00:03:32.919
was first read by Castle Rock Entertainment
producer Liz Gotser, who loved prison movies
47
00:03:34.319 --> 00:03:38.479
and she loved his script so much
she threatened to quit Castle Rock if they
48
00:03:38.479 --> 00:03:43.039
did not make the Shaw Shank Redemption. Obviously, Rob Reyner of Castle Rock
49
00:03:43.120 --> 00:03:46.400
had previously adapted King's nineteen eighty two
novella The Body and to Stand By Me.
50
00:03:46.879 --> 00:03:52.080
He wanted to do it with Tom
Cruise as Andy and Harrison Ford as
51
00:03:52.120 --> 00:03:55.599
read. The reason that Morgan Freeman
was cast was because Liz Gotser ignored the
52
00:03:55.639 --> 00:04:00.000
novella's description of a white guy,
a white irishman named Red. And you
53
00:04:00.039 --> 00:04:02.960
know, basically I guess one in
Freeman for it. So again, think
54
00:04:02.960 --> 00:04:08.599
about how critical her involvement that right
away, that's like half of the successive
55
00:04:08.639 --> 00:04:12.360
movie. Basically. Dary Bond initially
looked at some of his favorite actors like
56
00:04:12.599 --> 00:04:15.839
Gene Hackman and Albert Duval for the
role of Andy Dufraine, but they were
57
00:04:15.920 --> 00:04:19.279
unavailable. I would have loved to
see this with Duval, Tom Cruise,
58
00:04:19.319 --> 00:04:24.399
Tom Hanks, and Kevin Costner were
offered and passed on the role. But
59
00:04:24.480 --> 00:04:28.240
in Cruise's case, he attended table
readings in the script and he just didn't
60
00:04:28.240 --> 00:04:30.720
want to work for Darrebon because Darrebont
was not an experienced director. Now,
61
00:04:30.720 --> 00:04:33.879
at one point, and again according
to different sources on the Internet, it's
62
00:04:33.920 --> 00:04:38.360
between two and three million dollars.
Rob Ryner goes to Dary Bond and he
63
00:04:38.399 --> 00:04:42.600
says, if you let me make
the movie with Cruise like I'll direct the
64
00:04:42.639 --> 00:04:46.199
Cruisal starring it, I'll give you
three million bucks. Dere Bond's like,
65
00:04:46.199 --> 00:04:50.600
no, pretty remarkable. Brad Pitt
was initially cast in the role of Tommy,
66
00:04:50.800 --> 00:04:54.839
but he dropped out after his success
in Delma Louise and his was kind
67
00:04:54.879 --> 00:04:58.839
of a rising star and that kind
of thing. James Genelfini passed on portraying
68
00:04:59.399 --> 00:05:03.399
Bogs. In terms of the production, Morgan Freeman was pretty candid about Darbot
69
00:05:03.560 --> 00:05:08.720
being a pain in the ass.
He said, most of the time the
70
00:05:08.800 --> 00:05:12.319
tension was between the cast and director. I remember having a bad moment with
71
00:05:12.360 --> 00:05:14.800
the director, had a few of
those. He went on to say,
72
00:05:15.199 --> 00:05:19.240
the answer was no. In reference
to doing a lot of takes, I
73
00:05:19.319 --> 00:05:24.079
don't want to be chewing the scenery. Acting itself as indifficult, but having
74
00:05:24.120 --> 00:05:28.319
to do something again and again for
no discernible reason tends to be a bit
75
00:05:28.319 --> 00:05:32.120
debilitating to the energy. Interestingly enough, Morgan Freeman obviously was in seven David
76
00:05:32.120 --> 00:05:34.879
Fitcher film, So be interested to
know what do you thinks about David Fincher.
77
00:05:34.920 --> 00:05:41.879
But apparently it took nine hours to
film the part when Andy first approaches
78
00:05:41.920 --> 00:05:46.360
Read to procure a rock hammer.
They did so many takes that Freeman came
79
00:05:46.480 --> 00:05:48.680
to set the next day it was
his arm to sling and refused to do
80
00:05:48.720 --> 00:05:54.000
any indial takes. Darbot looking back, and it kind of has some quotes
81
00:05:54.040 --> 00:05:57.439
to suggest that he learned from it. He said, a director really needs
82
00:05:57.480 --> 00:06:00.879
to have an internal brometer to measure
what any of an actor needs. You
83
00:06:00.920 --> 00:06:04.000
know, as far as I start
what I mean, Darbot is one of
84
00:06:04.000 --> 00:06:10.319
the great writer, director, creative
people in the history of Hollywood. So
85
00:06:10.759 --> 00:06:14.560
it sounds like he learned from it
and probably made him a better director.
86
00:06:14.600 --> 00:06:15.639
But I mean, you know what
he said. I mean, the movie
87
00:06:15.680 --> 00:06:18.439
is amazing. It was it was
worth it. Yeah, I mean,
88
00:06:18.480 --> 00:06:21.240
it doesn't sound like he was abusive
or anything. It sounds like he just
89
00:06:21.279 --> 00:06:26.319
did a lot of takes. During
the iconic scene of Andy escaping your two
90
00:06:26.399 --> 00:06:30.759
freedom through a sewer pipe described as
a river of shit, Robin's crawled through
91
00:06:30.759 --> 00:06:33.720
a mixture of water, chocolate syrup, and sawdust. The stream that he
92
00:06:33.759 --> 00:06:39.839
emerged into was certified toxic by a
chemist and they had to damn the stream
93
00:06:39.959 --> 00:06:45.959
and use chlorination to partially decontaminate it. Robins said, when you're doing a
94
00:06:45.959 --> 00:06:46.680
film, you want to be a
good soldier. You don't want to be
95
00:06:46.759 --> 00:06:48.680
the one who gets in the way, so you will do things as an
96
00:06:48.680 --> 00:06:53.439
actor that are compromising to your physical
health and safety. We've gotten a lot
97
00:06:53.439 --> 00:07:00.920
better about that, said Roger.
Deakins said that the scene is one of
98
00:07:00.920 --> 00:07:03.480
his least favorite. He says he
overlid it. So this is scene when
99
00:07:03.800 --> 00:07:13.439
Robinson gets out of the sewer pipe
and all that. Darabont said that they
100
00:07:13.439 --> 00:07:15.720
had to be precisely what they could
film, so they had a limited filming
101
00:07:15.720 --> 00:07:18.199
schedule. He said he regretted that
he could not film a close up of
102
00:07:18.279 --> 00:07:23.000
Robin's face as he climbed down out
of the hole from his cell. So
103
00:07:23.040 --> 00:07:27.439
again, it just shows you that
no matter what you do, no matter
104
00:07:27.480 --> 00:07:30.720
how great of a thing you're creating
your life, you're always going to be
105
00:07:30.720 --> 00:07:34.079
like, oh man, I could
have been a better if I just did.
106
00:07:34.240 --> 00:07:40.800
It's amazing. That part's great,
Like what this like iconic said about
107
00:07:40.800 --> 00:07:44.560
It's just this is what I love
about doing these. One scripted scene,
108
00:07:44.600 --> 00:07:47.240
which Darabont described as his best work, was left unfilmed because of the shooting
109
00:07:47.240 --> 00:07:51.240
schedule, and the scene a dreaming
Red is sucked into the poster of Rita
110
00:07:51.279 --> 00:07:56.680
Hayworth to find himself alone and insignificant
on the Pacific shore, saying I am
111
00:07:56.800 --> 00:08:00.800
terrified. There's no way home.
Darabont said that you were gretted being unable
112
00:08:00.839 --> 00:08:03.920
to capture the scene that actually would
have been kind of cool, especially considering
113
00:08:03.920 --> 00:08:07.439
the ending. In Darabon's original vision
for the end of the film, Red
114
00:08:07.560 --> 00:08:11.720
is seen riding a bus towards the
Mexican border, leaving his fate ambiguous.
115
00:08:11.160 --> 00:08:16.319
Glotser insisted on including the scene of
Red and Andy reuniting and Zewatanejo, she
116
00:08:16.399 --> 00:08:20.839
said. Dara Bond felt this was
a commercial, sappy ending, but Glotser
117
00:08:20.879 --> 00:08:24.759
one of the audiences season together again. Can you imagine it's the difference if
118
00:08:24.800 --> 00:08:31.120
that was not there. It was
decided to mostly omit Stephen King's name from
119
00:08:31.120 --> 00:08:35.120
the advertising because the studio wanted to
attract a more prestigious audience who might reject
120
00:08:35.159 --> 00:08:39.960
a film from the writer of The
Shining and Kujoe Following a Hollywood tradition of
121
00:08:39.039 --> 00:08:43.080
visiting different theaters and opening night to
see the audience few their film live,
122
00:08:43.519 --> 00:08:46.639
Dara Bonning Lotser went to the Cinerama
Dome, so which is here, actually
123
00:08:46.679 --> 00:08:50.000
was down the street from where used
to live, but they found no one
124
00:08:50.039 --> 00:08:52.639
there. Glotzer claimed that the pair
actually sold two tickets outside the theater,
125
00:08:52.960 --> 00:08:56.279
with the promise that if the buyers
did not like the film, they could
126
00:08:56.279 --> 00:08:58.879
ask Castle Rock for a refund.
Quote. That was our big opening night,
127
00:09:00.200 --> 00:09:03.600
Glasser said dryly. While critics praise
the film, Glotser believed that a
128
00:09:03.679 --> 00:09:07.879
lackluster review from the Los Angeles Times
pushed crowds away. And here is that
129
00:09:07.960 --> 00:09:13.120
review from Kenneth Duran nineteen ninety four. This is what he said. Awash
130
00:09:13.360 --> 00:09:18.159
in a bad news culture where horrors
compete for media attention, America's appetite for
131
00:09:18.240 --> 00:09:22.639
feel good movies is all but insatiable. How else to explain The Shawshank Redemption,
132
00:09:22.840 --> 00:09:26.360
a film that hides a warm and
cuddly fantasy about prison life behind sleek
133
00:09:26.399 --> 00:09:31.240
brutality. So much the better to
convince us that even inside those walls,
134
00:09:31.320 --> 00:09:35.200
life can be grand. Starring Tim
Robbins and Morgan Freeman is two lifers who
135
00:09:35.240 --> 00:09:39.440
demonstrate the great things prison can do
for you. Shawshanks sense mentality is of
136
00:09:39.480 --> 00:09:43.320
a new Hollywood variety. Its message
of hope and friendship comes premixed to the
137
00:09:43.320 --> 00:09:48.559
sizeable ballop of unappetizing violence, intended
to convince audiences that what they're watching is
138
00:09:48.559 --> 00:09:52.720
in a big love of cotton candy
after all. Adapted from a Steve that
139
00:09:52.879 --> 00:09:56.720
just keeps going Like This, adapted
from a Stephen King novella. Shawshank also
140
00:09:56.799 --> 00:10:01.120
labors under its literary origins, with
many of its situations feeling like thin doodles
141
00:10:00.759 --> 00:10:05.279
blown up to big screen size,
and its entire last section has the kind
142
00:10:05.279 --> 00:10:09.440
of serious pausibility problems that are early
apparent when the written word takes physical form.
143
00:10:09.840 --> 00:10:13.639
Paradoxically, it is shaw shanks zealousness
in trying to cast a rosy glow
144
00:10:13.759 --> 00:10:18.879
over the prison experience that makes us
feel we're doing harder time than the folks
145
00:10:18.879 --> 00:10:22.679
inside. So Keath Duran basically thought
this movie sucked. He thought watching this
146
00:10:22.759 --> 00:10:28.360
movie was like being in prison.
He said, in fact, it was
147
00:10:28.440 --> 00:10:31.440
worse to be a prison. We're
doing harder time than the folks inside.
148
00:10:31.279 --> 00:10:35.759
I wonder if when Keneth Turan,
you know, Keneth Duran was obviously a
149
00:10:35.879 --> 00:10:39.759
very well known critic, retired from
Los Angeles Times at seventy three years old
150
00:10:39.759 --> 00:10:41.799
and twenty twenty. Do you think
when Keath Duran like hangs out with the
151
00:10:41.840 --> 00:10:45.840
other film critics, they give him
shit for this because there are I mean,
152
00:10:45.840 --> 00:10:48.279
when you go to press screenings,
it's there, there's all the different
153
00:10:48.279 --> 00:10:52.000
critics are invited and they all go
and you see each other again. You
154
00:10:52.039 --> 00:10:56.639
know, I did this in college, and I have to imagine that at
155
00:10:56.679 --> 00:10:58.639
least once or twice in his life. There must have been another critic was
156
00:10:58.679 --> 00:11:03.120
like, yeah, Shaw, Shank
really sucked huck Ken and really gave him
157
00:11:03.399 --> 00:11:09.240
for it. After bombing initially,
the movie did so well on television that,
158
00:11:09.279 --> 00:11:13.240
according to Business Insider, the actor
who plays the warden he said,
159
00:11:13.679 --> 00:11:18.159
he still gets residual payments, not
huge, but steady close to six figures.
160
00:11:18.679 --> 00:11:22.759
And even you know, this goes
all the way we're talking about like
161
00:11:22.799 --> 00:11:26.759
two thousand and four, like like
well after the movie is released. He
162
00:11:26.799 --> 00:11:31.480
even said, I suspect my daughter
years from now will still be getting checks.
163
00:11:31.919 --> 00:11:35.679
And then lastly, I thought Tim
Robbins kind of said it best the
164
00:11:35.759 --> 00:11:39.159
enduring power of the movie. He
said that I believe part of the reason
165
00:11:39.200 --> 00:11:41.519
the movie is so important to people
is that, in a way it works
166
00:11:41.840 --> 00:11:45.919
as a whole for whatever your life
is. That no matter what your prison
167
00:11:46.039 --> 00:11:48.320
is, whether it's a job you
hate, a bad relationship that you're slogging
168
00:11:48.360 --> 00:11:52.639
through, whether your warden is a
terrible boss or a wife or a husband,
169
00:11:54.279 --> 00:11:58.039
it holds out the possibility that there
is freedom inside you and that at
170
00:11:58.080 --> 00:12:01.399
some point in life there was a
warm spot in the beach and that we
171
00:12:01.440 --> 00:12:05.519
can all get there, but sometimes
it takes a while. How beautifully sad
172
00:12:05.559 --> 00:12:09.759
about Tim Robbins. So that's Shaw
shank Man. It's so great to see
173
00:12:09.759 --> 00:12:11.919
Tim and Silo. I don't know
what the hell they're doing with this character.
174
00:12:13.440 --> 00:12:16.559
I feel like they haven't given him
enough to do. I sincerely hope
175
00:12:16.639 --> 00:12:20.240
he is like way more prominent in
the rest of it. He's so good.
176
00:12:20.759 --> 00:12:22.840
It's like I talked about this when
I do the Silo episode. It
177
00:12:22.960 --> 00:12:26.879
just feels like, for whatever reason, they haven't figured out another role like
178
00:12:26.919 --> 00:12:31.399
that to give him. You know, he's he's so great if you can
179
00:12:31.480 --> 00:12:37.679
find the right thing to plug him
into and he's still relatively young, you
180
00:12:37.720 --> 00:12:39.960
know. I mean, there's still
time for him to have another sort of
181
00:12:39.960 --> 00:12:43.879
career defining role. And when you
think about Shaws Shank, you think about
182
00:12:43.919 --> 00:12:46.679
him and it Man. So that's
the making of the Shaw Shank redemption.
183
00:12:48.639 --> 00:12:54.799
With apologies to Kenneth Duran, that
is the show for today. I should
184
00:12:54.879 --> 00:12:58.799
no knock on wood. That's me
knocking on wood. I should have to
185
00:12:58.159 --> 00:13:03.720
really cools interviews as the next two
episodes. If all goes well, if
186
00:13:03.759 --> 00:13:07.720
something goes catastrophically wrong, you'll probably
just hear a regular episode M. But
187
00:13:07.840 --> 00:13:11.159
that's it for now. Thank you
so much as always for listening. Until
188
00:13:11.240 --> 00:13:20.639
next time, Bye bye, m
M.









